How do we know about the move to Sargon's Fortress, and also, how do we know about the death of Sargon II? Yes, there are very many sources that inform us about the move and the building of the Sargon's Fortress: letters especially, but also inscriptions of Sargon. The death is best known from one particular source that I'll tell you about now. It's the Assyrian Eponym Chronicle, which survives in a number of broken manuscripts like this one, from Nineveh, smashed into pieces presumably when the Median and Babylonian forces took the city in 612 BC. And the Assyrian Eponym Chronicle, it's quite a mouthful, is a list, more than anything it's a list. It's a list with several parts, and it matches the years of a particular king's reign, with the year names of this sequence of years. I think we may have mentioned at some point that the Assyrians didn't count years like we do, like 2017, 2018, instead, they chose an important person and used the name of that person to name that particular year. So they use what we call eponyms, “limmu” in Assyrian. So a year would be called, for example, the year of Shamshi-ilu, the commander-in-chief, or the year of a particular governor. Okay? And this is a complicated system, and you need to actually list the year names in this particular order because there's, otherwise, not a lot that will tell you in retrospect what the sequence is. And that's why they composed lists like this, like this manuscript here. Now, there are simple versions that only gave the king and the number of his regnal years and then lists the officials in sequence, usually with their title. That's important because all of these people in the first millennium are royal officials. The king appoints them, and they are very, very much associated with the king. In previous times, those were important people especially of the city of Assur, who had a lot of clout independent from the king. But from the reign of Ashurnasirpal II onwards is very much focused on the king, of course. So the simple version gives the king, then the number of years, and then the officials in the sequence in which they were year eponyms. The more complex version, the ones that we call chronicles, rather than merely lists, then in the last column, give key events that were of great importance for Assyrian history. And it is in these notes that we have information about the precise chronology of the move to the Sargon's Fortress to Dur-Šarruken, the new capital under Sargon II, and also his death. And I'll read some of these entries to you. So in the year 717 BC, when Ṭab-šar-Aššur was the year eponym, Dur-Šarruken was founded. It says in this list. And then in the year 707, when Ša-Aššur-dubbu was the year eponym, that is the year when on the 22nd day of the seventh month, that would be in October, the gods of Dur-Šarruken entered their temples, according to this list. So that's the most important event of the year. And by taking possessions of their temples, the gods basically inaugurated the city. And this is then the date when king and court also moved to the Sargon's Fortress. However, work continues, we gather from this because in the following year, when Mutakkil-Aššur was the year eponym, it says that on the sixth day of the second month, that would be in April, Dur-Šarruken was completed. So the move happened while construction work still continued. And then in the next year, very unfortunately, Sargon died on the battlefield. So this is in the year 705, and in this year, the Eponym Chronicle says, the king marched against Gurdi the Kulummaean. So this is this client ruler in Anatolia. The king was killed, the camp of the king of Assyria, then it's broken, was overrun, was destroyed, something like that, and on the 12th day of the fifth month, that would be in July, Sennacherib became king. Sennacherib is Sargon's son and successor. So we get a very precise chronology from these notes, and that's why the Assyrian Eponym Chronicles provide us with the backbone of Assyrian chronology. Okay, but how do we match this Assyrian chronological system with our own? Their year sequences - how do they match to “759 BC”? Yes. Well, this is a very good question, and the answer to this is quite easy. For one particular year, the most important event was a solar eclipse. So there was one very recently, and it captivated the world. The media reported extensively about the solar eclipse. And a solar eclipse in ancient Assyria was, if possible, even more of an event because anything that affected the sun and its appearance in the sky was so very closely associated, according to the astrological beliefs of the Assyrians, with the king and with the empire. So when in 763 BC, there was a solar eclipse. This was noted in the Eponym Chronicle. And that was the year of Bur-Saggile, governor of Guzana, he was a year eponym during the reign of Ashur-dan III, and because the solar eclipse is mentioned in the Eponym Chronicle, the entire sequence can be dated because one can backdate solar eclipses due to the very regular patterns that govern the movement of the planets around the sun. And that's the reason why we are on very safe grounds when we deal with Assyrian history because unlike for other periods of ancient history, it's absolutely possible to match dates very precisely. So each of these day dates that we mentioned from the Eponym Chronicle, we could pinpoint the exact day that they would correspond to in our calendar.